Alexeev, Y. et al. Quantum computer systems for scientific discovery. PRX Quantum 2, 017001 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58–65 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. Realization of real-time fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. X 11, 041058 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Quantum computing for scientific computing: A survey. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 155, 102012 (2024).
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
Google Scholar
Erdman, P. A. & Noé, F. Model-free optimization of power/efficiency tradeoffs in quantum thermal machines using reinforcement learning. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad248 (2023).
Willsch, D., Willsch, M., Jin, F., Michielsen, K. & De Raedt, H. Gpu-accelerated simulations of quantum annealing and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Comput. Phys. Commun. 278, 108417 (2022).
Google Scholar
Thomson, S. J. & Eisert, J. Unravelling quantum dynamics using flow equations. Nat. Phys. 20, 286–293 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bandi, A., Adapa, P. V. S. R. & Kuchi, Y. E. V. P. K. The power of generative ai: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet 15, 260 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, C. et al. A comprehensive survey on pretrained foundation models: a history from BERT to ChatGPT. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. (2024).
Vaswani, A. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017).
Achiam, J. et al. Gpt-4 technical report. Preprint at (2023).
Yenduri, G. et al. Gpt (generative pre-trained transformer)–a comprehensive review on enabling technologies, potential applications, emerging challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access (2024).
Cheng, K. et al. Exploring the potential of gpt-4 in biomedical engineering: the dawn of a new era. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1645–1653 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Generative artificial intelligence and its applications in materials science: Current situation and future perspectives. J. Materiomics 9, 798–816 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dunjko, V. & Briegel, H. J. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for quantum technologies. Phys. Rev. A 107, 010101 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M. & White, H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2, 359–366 (1989).
Google Scholar
Acampora, G. et al. Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives. Preprint at (2025).
Chen, M. et al. Grovergpt-2: Simulating grover’s algorithm via chain-of-thought reasoning and quantum-native tokenization. Preprint at (2025).
Peral-García, D., Cruz-Benito, J. & García-Peñalvo, F. J. Systematic literature review: Quantum machine learning and its applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53, 100030 (2024).
Zhuhadar, L. P. & Lytras, M. D. The application of automl techniques in diabetes diagnosis: current approaches, performance, and future directions. Sustainability 15, 13484 (2023).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Google Scholar
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P. & Heinrich, K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31, 685–695 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bernardo, J. et al. Generative or discriminative? getting the best of both worlds. Bayesian Stat. 8, 3–24 (2007).
Google Scholar
Arulkumaran, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Brundage, M. & Bharath, A. A. Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 26–38 (2017).
Google Scholar
Shakya, A. K., Pillai, G. & Chakrabarty, S. Reinforcement learning algorithms: A brief survey. Expert Syst. Appl. 231, 120495 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chowdhary, K. Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence. (2020).
Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K. & Singh, S. Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimed. Tools Appl. 82, 3713–3744 (2023).
Google Scholar
Irsoy, O. & Cardie, C. Deep recursive neural networks for compositionality in language. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2014).
Socher, R., Lin, C. C., Manning, C. & Ng, A. Y. Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), 129–136 (2011).
Han, K. et al. A survey on vision transformer. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 87–110 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ho, J., Jain, A. & Abbeel, P. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840–6851 (2020).
Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C. & Chen, M. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. Preprint at (2022).
Siddiqi, I. Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 875–891 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marshall, M. C. et al. High-precision mapping of diamond crystal strain using quantum interferometry. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 024041 (2022).
Google Scholar
Usman, M., Wong, Y. Z., Hill, C. D. & Hollenberg, L. C. Framework for atomic-level characterisation of quantum computer arrays by machine learning. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 19 (2020).
Google Scholar
Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. S.Quantum Optics (Cambridge university press, 1997).
Menke, T. et al. Automated design of superconducting circuits and its application to 4-local couplers. NPJ Quantum Inf. 7, 1–8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Menke, T. et al. Demonstration of tunable three-body interactions between superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 220501 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rajabzadeh, T., Boulton-McKeehan, A., Bonkowsky, S., Schuster, D. I. & Safavi-Naeini, A. H. A general framework for gradient-based optimization of superconducting quantum circuits using qubit discovery as a case study. Preprint at (2024).
Kumar, S., Tuli, S., Koch, J., Jha, N. & Houck, A. A. Graphq: High-Coherence Superconducting Circuit Optimization Using Graph Machine Learning. (2024).
Krenn, M., Kottmann, J. S., Tischler, N. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Conceptual understanding through efficient automated design of quantum optical experiments. Phys. Rev. X. 11, 031044 (2021).
Google Scholar
Flam-Shepherd, D. et al. Learning interpretable representations of entanglement in quantum optics experiments using deep generative models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 544–554 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cervera-Lierta, A., Krenn, M. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Design of quantum optical experiments with logic artificial intelligence. Quantum 6, 836 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Using reinforcement learning to guide graph state generation for photonic quantum computers. Preprint at (2024).
Severin, B. et al. Cross-architecture tuning of silicon and sige-based quantum devices using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 14, 17281 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fouad, A. F., Youssry, A., El-Rafei, A. & Hammad, S. Model-free distortion canceling and control of quantum devices. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 015002 (2025).
Zhuang, F. et al. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proc. IEEE 109, 43–76 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Driel, D. et al. Cross-platform autonomous control of minimal kitaev chains. Preprint at (2024).
Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090405 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wiebe, N., Granade, C., Ferrie, C. & Cory, D. G. Hamiltonian learning and certification using quantum resources. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190501 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gentile, A. A. et al. Learning models of quantum systems from experiments. Nat. Phys. 17, 837–843 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gebhart, V. et al. Learning quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 141–156 (2023).
Flynn, B., Gentile, A. A., Wiebe, N., Santagati, R. & Laing, A. Quantum model learning agent: characterisation of quantum systems through machine learning. N. J. Phys. 24, 053034 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sarma, B., Chen, J. & Borah, S. Precision quantum parameter inference with continuous observation. Preprint at (2024).
Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
Google Scholar
Che, L. et al. Learning quantum hamiltonians from single-qubit measurements. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023246 (2021).
Google Scholar
Luchnikov, I. A., Vintskevich, S. V., Grigoriev, D. A. & Filippov, S. N. Machine learning non-markovian quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 140502 (2020).
Google Scholar
Banchi, L., Grant, E., Rocchetto, A. & Severini, S. Modelling non-markovian quantum processes with recurrent neural networks. N. J. Phys. 20, 123030 (2018).
Google Scholar
Niu, M. Y. et al. Learning non-markovian quantum noise from moiré-enhanced swap spectroscopy with deep evolutionary algorithm. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.04368(2019).
Youssry, A., Chapman, R. J., Peruzzo, A., Ferrie, C. & Tomamichel, M. Modeling and control of a reconfigurable photonic circuit using deep learning. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 025001 (2020).
Google Scholar
Krastanov, S. et al. Unboxing quantum black box models: Learning non-markovian dynamics. Preprint at (2020).
Youssry, A. et al. Experimental graybox quantum system identification and control. NPJ Quantum Inf. 10, 9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Craig, D. L. et al. Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learning. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011001 (2024).
Google Scholar
Percebois, G. J. et al. Reconstructing the potential configuration in a high-mobility semiconductor heterostructure with scanning gate microscopy. SciPost Phys. 15, 242 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jung, K. et al. Deep learning enhanced individual nuclear-spin detection. NPJ Quantum Inf. 7, 41 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kulshrestha, A., Safro, I. & Alexeev, Y. Qarchsearch: A scalable quantum architecture search package. In Proceedings of the SC’23 Workshops of The International Conference on High Performance Computing, Network, Storage, and Analysis, 1487–1491 (2023).
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R. & Neven, H. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nat. Commun. 9, 4812 (2018).
Google Scholar
Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y. & Song, Z. A convergence theory for deep learning via over-parameterization. In International conference on machine learning, 242–252 (PMLR, 2019).
Wang, S. et al. Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms. Nat. Commun. 12, 6961 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anschuetz, E. R. & Kiani, B. T. Quantum variational algorithms are swamped with traps. Nat. Commun. 13, 7760 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shende, V. V., Markov, I. L. & Bullock, S. S. Synthesis of quantum logic circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 25, 1000–1010 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bukov, M. et al. Reinforcement learning in different phases of quantum control. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031086 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kremer, D., Villar, V., Vishwakarma, S., Faro, I. & Cruz-Benito, J. Ai methods for approximate compiling of unitaries. Preprint at (2024).
Fürrutter, F., Muñoz-Gil, G. & Briegel, H. J. Quantum circuit synthesis with diffusion models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 515–524 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. (eds. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W. M. & Frangi, A. F.) 234–241 (Springer, 2015).
Fürrutter, F., Chandani, Z., Hamamura, I., Briegel, H. J. & Muñoz-Gil, G. Synthesis of discrete-continuous quantum circuits with multimodal diffusion models. Preprint at (2025).
Ruiz, F. J. R. et al. Quantum circuit optimization with alphatensor. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 374–385 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fösel, T., Niu, M. Y., Marquardt, F. & Li, L. Quantum circuit optimization with deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at (2021).
Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L. & Wille, R. Compiler Optimization for Quantum Computing Using Reinforcement Learning. In 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC). 1–6 (IEEE, 2023).
Li, Z. et al. Quarl: A Learning-Based Quantum Circuit Optimizer. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 8, 114 (2024).
Preti, F. et al. Hybrid discrete-continuous compilation of trapped-ion quantum circuits with deep reinforcement learning. Quantum 8, 1343 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kremer, D. et al. Practical and efficient quantum circuit synthesis and transpiling with reinforcement learning. Preprint at (2024).
Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nakaji et al. The generative quantum eigensolver (gqe) and its application for ground state search. Preprint at (2024).
Minami, S., Nakaji, K., Suzuki, Y., Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Kadowaki, T. Generative quantum combinatorial optimization by means of a novel conditional generative quantum eigensolver. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16986(2025).
Tyagin, I. et al. Qaoa-gpt: Efficient generation of adaptive and regular quantum approximate optimization algorithm circuits. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16350(2025).
Bharti, K. et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).
Google Scholar
Falla, J., Langfitt, Q., Alexeev, Y. & Safro, I. Graph representation learning for parameter transferability in quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Quantum Mach. Intell. 6, 46 (2024).
Google Scholar
Galda, A. et al. Similarity-based parameter transferability in the quantum approximate optimization algorithm. Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 1200975 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sud, J., Hadfield, S., Rieffel, E., Tubman, N. & Hogg, T. Parameter-setting heuristic for the quantum alternating operator ansatz. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023171 (2024).
Google Scholar
Narayanan, A. et al. graph2vec: Learning distributed representations of graphs. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.05005(2017).
Zhang, C., Jiang, L. & Chen, F. Qracle: A graph-neural-network-based parameter initializer for variational quantum eigensolvers. Preprint at (2025).
Chen, H. & Koga, H. Gl2vec: Graph embedding enriched by line graphs with edge features. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing, 3–14 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019).
Galda, A., Liu, X., Lykov, D., Alexeev, Y. & Safro, I. Transferability of optimal qaoa parameters between random graphs. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 171–180 (IEEE, 2021).
Larocca, M. et al. A review of barren plateaus in variational quantum computing. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 174–189 (2024).
Langfitt, Q., Falla, J., Safro, I. & Alexeev, Y. Parameter transferability in qaoa under noisy conditions. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2, 300–301 (IEEE, 2023).
Verdon, G. et al. Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks. Preprint at (2019).
Wilson, M. et al. Optimizing quantum heuristics with meta-learning. Quantum Mach. Intell. 3, 1–14 (2021).
Google Scholar
Araujo, I. F., Park, D. K., Petruccione, F. & da Silva, A. J. A divide-and-conquer algorithm for quantum state preparation. Sci. Rep. 11, 6329 (2021).
Google Scholar
Arrazola, J. M. et al. Machine learning method for state preparation and gate synthesis on photonic quantum computers. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 024004 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cao, S. et al. Encoding optimization for quantum machine learning demonstrated on a superconducting transmon qutrit. Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 045037 (2024).
Google Scholar
Roca-Jerat, S., Román-Roche, J. & Zueco, D. Qudit machine learning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 015057 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sawaya, N. P. D. et al. HamLib: A library of Hamiltonians for benchmarking quantum algorithms and hardware. Quantum 8, 1559 (2024).
Baek, U. et al. Say no to optimization: A nonorthogonal quantum eigensolver. PRX Quantum 4, 030307 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mullinax, J. W. & Tubman, N. M. Large-scale sparse wave function circuit simulator for applications with the variational quantum eigensolver. J. Chem. Phys. 162, 074114 (2025).
Khan, A., Clark, B. K. & Tubman, N. M. Pre-optimizing variational quantum eigensolvers with tensor networks. Preprint at (2023).
Zhang, X.-M., Wei, Z., Asad, R., Yang, X.-C. & Wang, X. When does reinforcement learning stand out in quantum control? a comparative study on state preparation. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5, 85 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, W., Xu, J. & Wang, B. A quantum states preparation method based on difference-driven reinforcement learning. Spin 13, 2350013 (2023).
Ostaszewski, M., Trenkwalder, L. M., Masarczyk, W., Scerri, E. & Dunjko, V. Reinforcement learning for optimization of variational quantum circuit architectures. In Neural Information Processing Systems (2021).
Wang, Z. W. & Wang, Z. M. Arbitrary quantum states preparation aided by deep reinforcement learning. Phys. Scr. 100, 045103 (2025).
Haug, T. et al. Classifying global state preparation via deep reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 01LT02 (2020).
Burton, H. G. A., Marti-Dafcik, D., Tew, D. P. & Wales, D. J. Exact electronic states with shallow quantum circuits from global optimisation. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 75 (2023).
Sünkel, L., Martyniuk, D., Mattern, D., Jung, J. & Paschke, A. Ga4qco: Genetic algorithm for quantum circuit optimization. Preprint at (2023).
Chivilikhin, D. et al. Mog-vqe: Multiobjective genetic variational quantum eigensolver. Preprint at (2020).
Sorourifar, F. et al. Toward efficient quantum computation of molecular ground-state energies. AIChE J. e18887 (2025).
Duffield, S., Benedetti, M. & Rosenkranz, M. Bayesian learning of parameterised quantum circuits. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 4, 025007 (2023).
Google Scholar
Machnes, S. et al. Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022305 (2011).
Spörl, A. et al. Optimal control of coupled josephson qubits. Phys. Rev. A 75, 012302 (2007).
Heeres, R. W. et al. Implementing a universal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator. Nat. Commun. 8, 94 (2017).
Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T. & Glaser, S. J. Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. J. Magn. Reson. 172, 296–305 (2005).
Google Scholar
Sivak, E. A. L. Hea,V. V. Model-free quantum control with reinforcement learning. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011059 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ding, Y. et al. Breaking adiabatic quantum control with deep learning. Phys. Rev. A 103, L040401 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. N. et al. Reinforcement learning pulses for transmon qubit entangling gates. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 025066 (2024).
Google Scholar
Daraeizadeh, S. et al. Machine-learning-based three-qubit gate design for the toffoli gate and parity check in transmon systems. Phys. Rev. A 102, 012601 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wright, E. & De Sousa, R. Fast quantum gate design with deep reinforcement learning using real-time feedback on readout signals. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 1, 1295–1303 (IEEE, 2023).
Sivak, V. V. et al. Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature 616, 50–55 (2023).
Google Scholar
Porotti, R., Peano, V. & Marquardt, F. Gradient-ascent pulse engineering with feedback. PRX Quantum 4, 030305 (2023).
Google Scholar
Darulová, J. et al. Autotuning of double-dot devices in situ with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054005 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kalantre, S. S. et al. Machine learning techniques for state recognition and auto-tuning in quantum dots. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5, 6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. et al. Deep reinforcement learning for efficient measurement of quantum devices. NPJ Quantum Inf. 7, 100 (2021).
Google Scholar
van Esbroeck, N. M. et al. Quantum device fine-tuning using unsupervised embedding learning. N. J. Phys. 22, 095003 (2020).
Google Scholar
Durrer, R. et al. Automated tuning of double quantum dots into specific charge states using neural networks. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054019 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schuff, J. et al. Identifying pauli spin blockade using deep learning. Quantum 7, 1077 (2023).
Google Scholar
Moon, H. et al. Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human experts. Nat. Commun. 11, 4161 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Straaten, B. et al. All-rf-based coarse-tuning algorithm for quantum devices using machine learning. Phys. Rev. Appl. (2025).
Severin, B. AI for Quantum Computing in Silicon. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University (2023).
Hickie, J. et al. Automated long-range compensation of an rf quantum dot sensor. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064026 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rao, A. S. et al. Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrays. Phys. Rev. X 15, 021034 (2025).
Schuff, J. et al. Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit. Preprint at (2024).
Carballido, M. J. et al. Compromise-free scaling of qubit speed and coherence. Nat. Commun. 16, 7616 (2025).
Wozniakowski, A., Thompson, J., Gu, M. & Binder, F. C. A new formulation of gradient boosting. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 045022 (2021).
Daraeizadeh, S., Premaratne, S. P. & Matsuura, A. Y. Designing high-fidelity multi-qubit gates for semiconductor quantum dots through deep reinforcement learning. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 30–36 (IEEE, 2020).
Berritta, F. et al. Real-time two-axis control of a spin qubit. Nat. Commun. 15, 1676 (2024).
Google Scholar
Berritta, F. et al. Physics-informed tracking of qubit fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 014033 (2024).
Google Scholar
Scerri, E., Gauger, E. M. & Bonato, C. Extending qubit coherence by adaptive quantum environment learning. N. J. Phys. 22, 035002 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arshad, M. J. et al. Real-time adaptive estimation of decoherence timescales for a single qubit. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 024026 (2024).
Google Scholar
Koolstra, G. et al. Monitoring fast superconducting qubit dynamics using a neural network. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031017 (2022).
Google Scholar
Flurin, E., Martin, L. S., Hacohen-Gourgy, S. & Siddiqi, I. Using a recurrent neural network to reconstruct quantum dynamics of a superconducting qubit from physical observations. Phys. Rev. X 10, 011006 (2020).
Google Scholar
Porotti, R., Essig, A., Huard, B. & Marquardt, F. Deep reinforcement learning for quantum state preparation with weak nonlinear measurements. Quantum 6, 747 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vora, N. R. et al. Ml-powered fpga-based real-time quantum state discrimination enabling mid-circuit measurements. Preprint at (2024).
Metz, F. & Bukov, M. Self-correcting quantum many-body control using reinforcement learning with tensor networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 780–791 (2023).
Google Scholar
Niu, M. Y., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N. & Neven, H. Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. NPJ Quantum Inf. 5, 33 (2019).
Reuer, K. et al. Realizing a deep reinforcement learning agent for real-time quantum feedback. Nat. Commun. 14, 7138 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cimini, V. et al. Calibration of quantum sensors by neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 230502 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cimini, V. et al. Calibration of multiparameter sensors via machine learning at the single-photon level. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 044003 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rahman, A., Egger, D. J. & Arenz, C. Learning how to dynamically decouple by optimizing rotational gates. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054074 (2024).
Tong, C., Zhang, H. & Pokharel, B. Empirical learning of dynamical decoupling on quantum processors. PRX Quantum 6, 030319 (2025).
Huang, J. Y. et al. High-fidelity spin qubit operation and algorithmic initialization above 1 K. Nature 627, 772–777 (2024).
Sarma, B., Borah, S., Kani, A. & Twamley, J. Accelerated motional cooling with deep reinforcement learning. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042038 (2022).
Porotti, R., Tamascelli, D., Restelli, M. & Prati, E. Coherent transport of quantum states by deep reinforcement learning. Commun. Phys. 2, 61 (2019).
Google Scholar
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zou, Y. et al. El Agente: An autonomous agent for quantum chemistry. Matter 8, 102263 (2025).
M. Bran, A. et al. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 525–535 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cao, S. et al. Automating quantum computing laboratory experiments with an agent-based AI framework. Patterns 6, 101372 (2025).
Bausch, J. et al. Learning high-accuracy error decoding for quantum processors. Nature 635, 834–840 (2024).
Terhal, B. M. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307–346 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chamberland, C., Goncalves, L., Sivarajah, P., Peterson, E. & Grimberg, S. Techniques for combining fast local decoders with global decoders under circuit-level noise. Quantum Sci. Technol. 8, 045011 (2023).
Google Scholar
Skoric, L., Browne, D. E., Barnes, K. M., Gillespie, N. I. & Campbell, E. T. Parallel window decoding enables scalable fault tolerant quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 14, 7040 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tan, X., Zhang, F., Chao, R., Shi, Y. & Chen, J. Scalable surface-code decoders with parallelization in time. PRX Quantum 4, 040344 (2023).
Google Scholar
Battistel, F. et al. Real-time decoding for fault-tolerant quantum computing: Progress, challenges and outlook. Nano Futures 7, 032003 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kurman, Y. et al. Benchmarking the Ability of a Controller to Execute Quantum Error Corrected Non-Clifford Circuits. IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 6, 1–14 (2025).
Litinski, D. A game of surface codes: Large-scale quantum computing with lattice surgery. Quantum 3, 128 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chamberland, C. & Campbell, E. T. Universal quantum computing with twist-free and temporally encoded lattice surgery. PRX Quantum 3, 010331 (2022).
Google Scholar
Torlai, G. & Melko, R. G. Neural decoder for topological codes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030501 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chamberland, C. & Ronagh, P. Deep neural decoders for near term fault-tolerant experiments. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 044002 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wagner, T., Kampermann, H. & Bruß, D. Symmetries for a high-level neural decoder on the toric code. Phys. Rev. A 102, 042411 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baireuther, P., O’Brien, T. E., Tarasinski, B. & Beenakker, C. W. Machine-learning-assisted correction of correlated qubit errors in a topological code. Quantum 2, 48 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sweke, R., Kesselring, M. S., van Nieuwenburg, E. P. & Eisert, J. Reinforcement learning decoders for fault-tolerant quantum computation. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 025005 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andreasson, P., Johansson, J., Liljestrand, S. & Granath, M. Quantum error correction for the toric code using deep reinforcement learning. Quantum 3, 183 (2019).
Google Scholar
Breuckmann, N. P. & Ni, X. Scalable neural network decoders for higher dimensional quantum codes. Quantum 2, 68 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ueno, Y., Kondo, M., Tanaka, M., Suzuki, Y. & Tabuchi, Y. Neo-qec: Neural network enhanced online superconducting decoder for surface codes. Preprint at (2022).
Wang, H. et al. Transformer-qec: Quantum error correction code decoding with transferable transformers. In 2023 International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), Fast Machine Learning for Science Workshop (2023).
Lange, M. et al. Data-driven decoding of quantum error correcting codes using graph neural networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023181 (2025).
Maan, A. S. & Paler, A. Machine learning message-passing for the scalable decoding of QLDPC codes. npj Quantum Inf. 11, 78 (2025).
Wang, H. et al. Dgr: Tackling drifted and correlated noise in quantum error correction via decoding graph re-weighting. Preprint at (2023).
Davaasuren, A., Suzuki, Y., Fujii, K. & Koashi, M. General framework for constructing fast and near-optimal machine-learning-based decoder of the topological stabilizer codes. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033399 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gicev, S., Hollenberg, L. C. L. & Usman, M. A scalable and fast artificial neural network syndrome decoder for surface codes. Quantum 7, 1058 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hall, B., Gicev, S. & Usman, M. Artificial neural network syndrome decoding on ibm quantum processors. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032004 (2024).
Google Scholar
Blue, J., Avlani, H., He, Z., Ziyin, L. & Chuang, I. L. Machine learning decoding of circuit-level noise for bivariate bicycle codes. Preprint at (2025).
Rodriguez, P. S. et al. Experimental demonstration of logical magic state distillation. Nature 645, 620–625 (2025).
Olle, J., Zen, R., Puviani, M. & Marquardt, F. Simultaneous discovery of quantum error correction codes and encoders with a noise-aware reinforcement learning agent. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 126 (2024).
Mauron, C., Farrelly, T. & Stace, T. M. Optimization of tensor network codes with reinforcement learning. N. J. Phys. 26, 023024 (2024).
Google Scholar
Su, V. P. et al. Discovery of optimal quantum codes via reinforcement learning. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 034048 (2025).
Cao, C. & Lackey, B. Quantum lego: building quantum error correction codes from tensor networks. PRX Quantum 3, 020332 (2022).
Google Scholar
Delfosse, N. & Nickerson, N. H. Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes. Quantum 5, 595 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gidney, C. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits. Preprint at (2025).
Magesan, E., Gambetta, J. M., Córcoles, A. D. & Chow, J. M. Machine learning for discriminating quantum measurement trajectories and improving readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 200501 (2015).
Google Scholar
Martinez, L. A., Rosen, Y. J. & DuBois, J. L. Improving qubit readout with hidden markov models. Phys. Rev. A 102, 062426 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lienhard, B. et al. Deep-neural-network discrimination of multiplexed superconducting-qubit states. Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014024 (2022).
Google Scholar
Luchi, P. et al. Enhancing qubit readout with autoencoders. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 014045 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cao, S. et al. Superconducting qubit readout enhanced by path signature. Preprint at (2024).
Phuttitarn, L., Becker, B., Chinnarasu, R., Graham, T. & Saffman, M. Enhanced measurement of neutral-atom qubits with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 024011 (2024).
Google Scholar
Seif, A. et al. Machine learning assisted readout of trapped-ion qubits. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51, 174006 (2018).
Google Scholar
Anshu, A. & Arunachalam, S. A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 59–69 (2024).
Google Scholar
Struck, T. et al. Robust and fast post-processing of single-shot spin qubit detection events with a neural network. Sci. Rep. 11, 16203 (2021).
Google Scholar
D’Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. & Sacchi, M. F. Quantum tomography. Adv. imaging electron Phys. 128, S1076–5670 (2003).
Torlai, G. et al. Neural-network quantum state tomography. Nat. Phys. 14, 447–450 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yao, J. & You, Y.-Z. Shadowgpt: Learning to solve quantum many-body problems from randomized measurements. Preprint at (2024).
Schmale, T., Reh, M. & Gärttner, M. Efficient quantum state tomography with convolutional neural networks. NPJ Quantum Inf. 8, 115 (2022).
Google Scholar
Quek, Y., Fort, S. & Ng, H. K. Adaptive quantum state tomography with neural networks. NPJ Quantum Inf. 7, 105 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cao, S. et al. Efficient characterization of qudit logical gates with gate set tomography using an error-free virtual z gate model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 120802 (2024).
Google Scholar
Blume-Kohout, R. et al. A taxonomy of small markovian errors. PRX Quantum 3, 020335 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brieger, R., Roth, I. & Kliesch, M. Compressive gate set tomography. PRX Quantum 4, 010325 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yu, K. Y., Sarkar, A., Rimbach-Russ, M., Ishihara, R. & Feld, S. Transformer models for quantum gate set tomography. Quantum Mach. Intell. 7, 10 (2025).
Zimborás, Z. et al. Myths around quantum computation before full fault tolerance: What no-go theorems rule out and what they don’t. Preprint at (2025).
Aharonov, D. et al. On the importance of error mitigation for quantum computation. Preprint at (2025).
Bonet-Monroig, X., Sagastizabal, R., Singh, M. & O’Brien, T. E. Low-cost error mitigation by symmetry verification. Phys. Rev. A 98, 062339 (2018).
Google Scholar
McArdle, S., Yuan, X. & Benjamin, S. Error-mitigated digital quantum simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 180501 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huggins, W. J. et al. Virtual distillation for quantum error mitigation. Phys. Rev. X 11, 041036 (2021).
Google Scholar
Koczor, B. Exponential error suppression for near-term quantum devices. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031057 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Fei, Y.-Y. & Cai, Z. Virtual Channel Purification. PRX Quantum 6, 020325 (2025).
Li, Y. & Benjamin, S. C. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017).
Temme, K., Bravyi, S. & Gambetta, J. M. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017).
Google Scholar
McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J. & de Jong, W. A. Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states. Phys. Rev. A 95, 042308 (2017).
Google Scholar
Strikis, A., Qin, D., Chen, Y., Benjamin, S. C. & Li, Y. Learning-based quantum error mitigation. PRX Quantum 2, 040330 (2021).
Google Scholar
Czarnik, P., Arrasmith, A., Coles, P. J. & Cincio, L. Error mitigation with Clifford quantum-circuit data. Quantum 5, 592 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kim, C., Park, K. D. & Rhee, J.-K. Quantum error mitigation with artificial neural network. IEEE Access 8, 188853–188860 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gulania, S. et al. Quantum Time Dynamics Mediated by the Yang–Baxter Equation and Artificial Neural Networks. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 6280–6291 (2025).
Liao, H. et al. Machine learning for practical quantum error mitigation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1478–1486 (2024).
Bennewitz, E. R., Hopfmueller, F., Kulchytskyy, B., Carrasquilla, J. & Ronagh, P. Neural error mitigation of near-term quantum simulations. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 618–624 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cai, Z. et al. Quantum error mitigation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045005 (2023).
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. National quantum information science research centers. (2024).
EuroHPC Joint Undertaking. European high performance computing joint undertaking. (2024).
The CUDA-Q development team. CUDA-Q (2024).
Beck, T. et al. Integrating quantum computing resources into scientific hpc ecosystems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 161, 112212 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kim, J.-S. Leverage ai coding assistants to develop quantum applications at scale with nvidia cuda-q. (2024).
Learn quantum computing with azure quantum. (2024).
Kharkov, Y., Mohammad, Z., Beach, M. & Kessler, E. Accelerate quantum software development on Amazon Braket with Claude-3.https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/quantum-computing/accelerate-quantum-software-development-on-amazon-braket-with-claude-3/(2024).
Placidi, L. et al. Mnisq: A large-scale quantum circuit dataset for machine learning on/for quantum computers in the nisq era. Preprint at (2023).
Zwolak, J. P. et al. Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automation. NPJ Quantum Inf. 10, 105 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vishwakarma, S. et al. Qiskit HumanEval: An Evaluation Benchmark for Quantum Code Generative Models. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE). 1169–1176 (IEEE, 2024).
Koopman, B. O. Hamiltonian systems and transformation in hilbert space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17, 315–318 (1931).
Google Scholar
Benioff, P. The computer as a physical system: A microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines. J. Stat. Phys. 22, 563–591 (1980).
Google Scholar
Benioff, P. Quantum mechanical hamiltonian models of turing machines. J. Stat. Phys. 29, 515–546 (1982).
Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488 (1982).
Google Scholar
Breuer, H. & Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Vidal, G. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
Gottesman, D. The heisenberg representation of quantum computers. Preprint at (1998).
Aaronson, S. & Gottesman, D. Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits. Phys. Rev. 70, 052328 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bravyi, S. & Gosset, D. Improved classical simulation of quantum circuits dominated by clifford gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 250501 (2016).
Google Scholar
Aharonov, D., Gao, X., Landau, Z., Liu, Y. & Vazirani, U. A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’23 (ACM, 2023).
González-García, G., Cirac, J. I. & Trivedi, R. Pauli path simulations of noisy quantum circuits beyond average case. Quantum 9, 1730 (2025).
van Straaten, B. et al. QArray: A GPU-accelerated constant capacitance model simulator for large quantum dot arrays. SciPost Phys. Codebases 35 (2024).
van Straaten, B. et al. Codebase release 1.3 for QArray. (2024).
Bayraktar, H. et al. cuquantum sdk: A high-performance library for accelerating quantum science. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 01, 1050–1061 (2023).
Carrasquilla, J. & Melko, R. G. Machine learning phases of matter. Nat. Phys. 13, 431–434 (2017).
Google Scholar
Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 602–606 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lange, H., Van de Walle, A., Abedinnia, A. & Bohrdt, A. From architectures to applications: A review of neural quantum states. Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 040501 (2024).
Yang, T.-H., Soleimanifar, M., Bergamaschi, T. & Preskill, J. When can classical neural networks represent quantum states? Preprint at (2024).
Bukov, M., Schmitt, M. & Dupont, M. Learning the ground state of a non-stoquastic quantum hamiltonian in a rugged neural network landscape. SciPost Phys. 10, 147 (2021).
Google Scholar
Han, C.-D., Glaz, B., Haile, M. & Lai, Y.-C. Tomography of time-dependent quantum hamiltonians with machine learning. Phys. Rev. A 104, 062404 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mohseni, N., Fösel, T., Guo, L., Navarrete-Benlloch, C. & Marquardt, F. Deep learning of quantum many-body dynamics via random driving. Quantum 6, 714 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shah, F. et al. Fourier neural operators for learning dynamics in quantum spin systems. Preprint at (2024).
Craig, D. L., Ares, N. & Gauger, E. M. Differentiable master equation solver for quantum device characterisation. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043175 (2024).
Silver, D. et al. A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play. Science 362, 1140–1144 (2018).
Fawzi, A. et al. Discovering faster matrix multiplication algorithms with reinforcement learning. Nature 610, 47–53 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bengio, E., Jain, M., Korablyov, M., Precup, D. & Bengio, Y. Flow network based generative models for non-iterative diverse candidate generation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 27381–27394 (2021).
Xiao, Y., Nazarian, S. & Bogdan, P. A stochastic quantum program synthesis framework based on bayesian optimization. Sci. Rep. 11, 13138 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. & Yu, K. Artificial intelligence (ai) for quantum and quantum for ai. Opt. Quantum Electron. 55, 697 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bang, J., Ryu, J., Yoo, S., Pawłowski, M. & Lee, J. A strategy for quantum algorithm design assisted by machine learning. N. J. Phys. 16, 073017 (2014).
Google Scholar
Grimsley, H. R., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E. & Mayhall, N. J. An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer. Nat. Commun. 10, 3007 (2019).
Google Scholar
Teske, J. D. et al. A machine learning approach for automated fine-tuning of semiconductor spin qubits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 133102 (2019).
Google Scholar
link